Con
una dose di un qualsiasi vaccino contenente
Thimerosal si inocula
mercurio nei bambini.
Se volete
comunque far vaccinare il vostro bambino, richiedete i vaccini che NON contengano
Thiomersal (conservante a base di mercurio), né idrossido di alluminio (alluminio) che
sono metalli molto tossici.
Questi conservanti sono contenuti anche in altri vaccini
antinfluenzali
utilizzati in Italia !
Studi americani hanno evidenziato il possibile nesso fra queste terribili sostanze
tossiche e malattie del sistema linfatico, nervoso ed immunitario nei bambini e nei
giovani vaccinati
J Pediatr 2000 May;136(5):679-8 Iatrogenic exposure to mercury after hepatitis B vaccination in preterm
infants.
Stajich GV, Lopez GP, Harry SW, Sexson WR Mercer University, Southern School of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.
Thimerosal, a derivative of mercury, is used as a preservative in hepatitis B
vaccines.
We measured total mercury levels before and after the administration of this
vaccine in 15 preterm and 5 term infants.
Comparison of pre- and post-vaccination mercury
levels showed a significant increase in both preterm and term infants after vaccination. Additionally,
post-vaccination mercury levels were significantly higher in preterm infants as
compared with term infants. Because mercury is known to be a potential neurotoxin to
infants, further study of its pharmacodynamics is warranted. PMID: 10802503,
UI: 20263990
VACCINAZIONE
LA CADUTA DEL MITO (estratto seconda parte)
vedi:
Falsita'
della medicina ufficiale +
1000 studi sui Danni dei Vaccini
+
Malassorbimento
+
Contenuto dei Vaccini
+
Medici pagati dall'industria dei
Vaccini
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 1:
“I vaccini sono totalmente sicuri.”…o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 1:
“La vaccinazione provoca in misura significativa morte e
menomazioni ad un costo personale e finanziario sbalorditivo per le
famiglie ed i contribuenti.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 2:
“ I vaccini sono molto efficaci.” …o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 2:
“L’evidenza suggerisce che la vaccinazione è un inaffidabile
mezzo di prevenzione della malattia.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 3:
“I vaccini sono la ragione principale del basso tasso di malattie
negli USA oggi.” …o no ?
Verità della vaccinazione N 3:
“Non è chiaro quale impatto abbiano i vaccini sul declino delle
malattie infettive registrato lungo tutto questo secolo.”
-
Mito
della Vaccinazione N 4:
“La vaccinazione si basa su una fondata teoria e pratica
dell’immunizzazione.” …o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 4:
“Molte delle assunzioni su cui si basano la teoria e la pratica
dell’immunizzazione si sono rivelate false nella loro
applicazione.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 5:
“Le malattie infantili sono estremamente pericolose.” …o in
realtà no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 5:
“I pericoli delle malattie infantili vengono molto esagerati al
fine di spaventare i genitori e renderli accondiscendenti verso una
procedura opinabile ma remunerativa.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 6:
“Quello contro la polio fu chiaramente uno dei grandi successi
nella storia delle vaccinazioni.” …o non lo fu ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 6:
“I vaccini causarono un sostanziale incremento della polio dopo
anni di declino costante, e sono la sola causa di polio negli USA
oggi.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 7:
“Mio figlio non ha avuto reazioni a breve termine alla
vaccinazione, quindi non vi è nulla di cui preoccuparsi.” … o si?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 7:
“Gli effetti avversi a lungo termine delle vaccinazioni sono stati
virtualmente ignorati nonostante le dirette correlazioni con molte
condizioni croniche.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 8:
“I vaccini sono la sola opzione disponibile per la prevenzione
della malattia.” … o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 8:
“Sicure, documentate ed efficaci alternative alla vaccinazione sono
state disponibili per decenni ma soppresse dall’apparato medico.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 9:
“Le vaccinazioni sono legalmente obbligatorie, e quindi
inevitabili.” …o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 9:
“Molti cittadini statunitensi – ma non tutti – possono ottenere
l’esenzione legale.”
-
Mito
della vaccinazione N 10:
“ Gli ufficiali della pubblica sanità mettono sempre al primo posto
la salute.” … o no ?
Verità sulla vaccinazione N 10:
“Gli ufficiali sanitari compromettono la salute pubblica quando
cercano di perpetuare i miti della vaccinazione che non sono
supportati dall’evidenza medica.”
By Allan Phillips
Tratto da:
Nexus Ed Italiana
n° 15
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Il MITO delle
VACCINAZIONI
Il mito delle vaccinazioni vacilla, ma è ben lungi dal
crollare. Nelle nostre menti è stato inculcato che i
vaccini avrebbero debellato le malattie endemiche quali
vaiolo, difterite, poliomielite ecc., che non ci sarebbero
danni da vaccino e che comunque se esistessero sarebbero
rarissimi ed incomparabili agli immensi benefici che i
vaccini avrebbero apportato all'umanità.
Un esame più attento però rivela che in questi 200 anni di
epoca vaccinale l'opinione egli "addetti ai lavori" non fu
mai unanime e lo dimostrano i convegni dove medici pro e
contro si sono scontrati.
Rivolte popolari si sollevarono contro quei governi che
imponevano vaccinazioni obbligatorie. Questo perché
frequenti e gravissimi furono i fallimenti delle
vaccinazioni di massa. Si rilevò infatti che Paesi ad
altissimo tasso di immunizzazione vaccinale avevano la
stessa incidenza di mortalità di Paesi con scarsa o nulla
copertura vaccinale, ma ancor più grave fu l'evidenza di
casi in cui, in corrispondenza della diffusione di un
dato vaccino, seguiva una netta recrudescenza della malattia
dalla quale lo stesso pretendeva di proteggere.
Documentate sono infatti gravi epidemie, che hanno colpito
quasi esclusivamente i soggetti vaccinati. Per fare qualche
esempio vediamo il Regno Unito che ha conosciuto per primo
l'obbligo della vaccinazione antivaiolosa e che subì i più
duri attacchi da parte del vaiolo proprio quando la
popolazione fu meglio vaccinata.
La percentuale dei vaccinati fu vicina al 90% quando la
terribile epidemia del 1871-1872 uccise 23.000 persone e
ciò avvenne dopo tredici anni di vaccinazione facoltativa
più diciotto anni di vaccinazione strettamente obbligatoria
(cifre del ministero della Sanità della Gran Bretagna).
Di
fronte a questo fallimento gli inglesi abbandonarono un po'
alla volta le vaccinazioni, ma misero in piedi un programma
igienico, fogne, condutture d'acqua, raccolta dei rifiuti,
isolamento e assistenza dei malati precedendo di un secolo
la strategia dell'O.M.S.
Il vaiolo allora regredì in modo spettacolare (vedi
l'ufficiale sanitario inglese Hadwen. S., Hygienic measures
or immunisation ?,(in) "Truth", 17 gen. 1923).
Da uno studio pubblicato dal Dott. Gerhard Buchwald, uno dei
massimi esperti in questo campo, risulta che non solo la
vaccinazione antivaiolo non protegge, ma anche che i
vaccinati possono essere colpiti dalla forma più grave
della malattia. (1)
La Germania, in pochi anni a partire dal 1871, registrò
125.000 morti per vaiolo, e ciò dopo 35 anni di regime di
vaccinazione forzata stabilita per legge.
L'enciclopedia britannica (9^ edizione) riporta che dei
30.742 casi di vaiolo in Baviera nel 1871, 29.429 si erano
verificate in persone vaccinate.
La Svezia rivaccina sistematicamente la popolazione nel 1871
e di nuovo nel 1872, ma nel 1873 è teatro della più
tremenda epidemia di vaiolo della sua storia.
Si potrebbe citare una quantità enorme di dati, ma per
ragioni di spazio facciamo un salto ad un'epoca più recente.
In Albania già dal 1985 non si registrano più casi di
poliomielite, ma nel 1996 iniziarono una campagna di
vaccinazione di massa, che coinvolse bambini e adulti con
vaccino Sabin. Nei mesi seguenti si registrarono un
centinaio di casi di polio, tra cui vari casi mortali. Per
il panico che si scatenò venne inviata una delegazione dell'O.M.S.,
del C.D.C. di Atlanta e dell'Istituto Superiore della
Sanità.
Un esperto dell'I.S.S., direttore del laboratorio di
epidemiologia (il Dr. Donato Greco), confermò, dichiarandolo
su tutti i giornali, che i casi erano dovuti al vaccino.
Fu però immediatamente smentito, poiché una tale notizia
stava diffondendo il panico (fonti: a. "Polio outbreak in
Albania, 1996 Autori. Ciofi degli Atti, Prevots, Sallabanda,
Malfait, Aylwarc, Greco, Wassilak; Eurosurveillance vol. 2,
n. 5, maggio 1997. b. "Vaccini sbagliati: è allarme
poliomielite in Albania" - Il Gazzettino 1/9/96).
Ora vi è certezza di un gran numero di reazioni avverse,
danni lievi, gravi, a volte irreversibili, che si
manifestano immediatamente o ad effetto tardivo. Per citare
un caso della situazione italiana i dati di fonte Seieva,
pubblicati sul bollettino "Vaccinazione 2000" n. 46 del
febbraio 1997 (261 USL su 650), dicono che dall'85 al '94
l'incidenza di epatite B in Italia per 100.000 abitanti è
andata calando, ancor prima dell'introduzione dell'obbligo
vaccinale (1991), passando dai 6 casi dell'85 ad 1 caso nel
'90 (1/100.000), rimanendo tale anche anni dopo
l'introduzione della vaccinazione obbligatoria nel '91 [dati
Sistema epidemiologico integrato dell'epatite virale acuta
(classe di età 0-14 anni)]. I dati si trovano sul sito
dell'Istituto Superiore della Sanità:
http://www.iss.it/registri/seieva/tab2.htm
(NdR: dati spostati o
spariti...chissa' perche' ?)
Dal 91-96 compreso, per i bambini (classe di età 0-14 anni)
si sono avuti però 340 effetti collaterali ufficiali da
vaccino antiepatite B (dati della commissione nazionale
vaccini, tratti dal documento "Vaccinazione antiepatite B e
sclerosi multipla", tabella Reazioni avverse a vaccinazione
antiepatite B 1991-1996). Il documento è reperibile sul sito
del ministero della sanità italiano:
http://www.sanita.interbusiness.it/malinf/certvacc/epatb/epatb.htm
- (NdR: tabella
sparita chissa' perche'....?)
vedi: Ministero
informato sui gravi danni dei vaccini
(Commento NdR: pero' anche se l'epatite
era gia' in caduta verticale
prima della vaccinazione
obbligatoria, hanno
spacciato la cosa come se fosse stata la
vaccinazione a ridurla....)
Si consideri che molto probabilmente, gli effetti
collaterali riconosciuti sono solo una piccola parte di
quelli effettivi, in quanto è noto che vi è in Italia una
diffusa sotto-notificazione degli effetti collaterali da
vaccino.
Infatti, secondo il commissario della
Food And Drug
Administration David Kessler, i
danni da vaccino con un
sistema di sorveglianza passivo sono sottostimati del 90%.
Nonostante i numerosi interventi di quella classe
medica legata agli
interessi dell'industria, interventi mirati a
confondere la gente ed occultare la verità, sono disponibili
al cercatore attento una enorme mole di dati sia nella
letteratura internazionale sia nelle pubblicazioni di
onesti
ricercatori, giornalisti scientifici, storici della medicina
e medici dissidenti.
Da alcuni anni il Giappone
ha abrogato l'obbligo vaccinale perché le casse dello stato
rischiavano di andare in bancarotta, tanti erano i danni da
vaccino che il governo doveva risarcire.Da molto tempo nella
maggioranza dei Paesi europei si è abrogata
l'obbligatorietà vaccinale e si sono varate leggi per il
risarcimento dei danni da vaccino (per morte o invalidità).
Italia e Francia sono gli unici Paesi
europei dove ancora vige l'obbligatorietà.....e
cio' grazie a
Big Pharma
By Comilva.org
Bibliografia:
(1) Vaccinazioni - Quello che ogni genitore dovrebbe sapere
- del Dott. Gerhard Buchwald edizioni Civis
- Bambini sani senza medicinali - del pediatra Dott. Robert Mendelshon - Red
- Autismo - nuove terapie per migliorare e guarire - ultime
ricerche: I VACCINI tra le cause della malattia - del
pediatra Dott. Massimo Montinari - Macro Edizioni
- L'intossicazione da vaccino - Fernand Delarue (presidente
della Ligue National pour la liberté des vaccinations.),
Feltrinelli editore.
- Vaccinazioni - Quando, come e perché ricorrervi - Dr.
Lorenzo Acerra - Demetra
- Danni causati da vaccini e sieri - Dr. Herbert M. Shelton
- Associazione Igienista Italiana
- Vaccinazioni - il grande attacco al cervello e alla psiche
- Dr. Harris L. Coulter - NOI - Verlag, Klagenfurt con Macro
Edizioni
- Vaccinazioni Perché ? - L'indebolimento della salute e
dell'eredità genetica umana - Valerio Pignatta - Macro
Edizioni
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Contradictions between Medical Science and
Immunization Policy
By Alan Phillips
www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/dvm1.htm
When my son began his routine vaccination series at age 2
months, I did not know there were any
risks
associated with
immunizations. But the clinic's literature
contained
a
contradiction: the chances of a serious adverse
reaction to the DPT vaccine were 1 in 1750, while his
chances of dying from pertussis each year were 1 in several
million. When I pointed this out to the physician, he
angrily disagreed, and stormed out of the room mumbling, "I
guess I should read that sometime..."
Soon thereafter I learned of a child who had been
permanently disabled by a vaccine, so I decided to
investigate for myself. My findings have so alarmed me that
I feel compelled to share them; hence, this report.
Health authorities credit vaccines for disease declines, and
assure us of their safety and effectiveness.
Yet these seemingly rock-solid assumptions are directly
contradicted by government statistics, medical studies, Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) reports, and reputable research scientists
from around the world.
In fact, infectious diseases declined steadily for decades
prior to vaccinations, U.S. doctors report thousands of
serious vaccine reactions each year including hundreds of
deaths and permanent disabilities, fully vaccinated
populations have experienced epidemics, and researchers
attribute dozens of chronic immunological and neurological
conditions to mass immunization programs.
There are hundreds of published medical studies documenting
vaccine failure and adverse effects, and dozens of books
written by doctors, researchers, and independent
investigators that reveal serious flaws in immunization
theory and practice. Ironically, most pediatricians and
parents are completely unaware of these findings. However,
this has begun to change in recent years, as a growing
number of parents and healthcare providers around the world
are becoming aware of the problems and starting to question
the use of widespread, mandatory vaccinations.
My point is not to tell anyone whether or not to vaccinate,
but rather, with the utmost urgency, to point out some very
good reasons why everyone should examine the facts before
deciding whether or not to submit to the procedure. As a new
parent, I was shocked to discover the absence of a legal
mandate or professional ethic requiring pediatricians to be
fully informed, and to see first-hand the prevalence of
physicians who are applying practices based on
incomplete--and in some cases, outright mis-information.
Though only a brief introduction, this report contains
sufficient evidence to warrant further investigation by all
concerned, which I highly recommend. You will find that this
is the only way to get an objective view, as the controversy
is a highly emotional one.
A note of caution: Be careful trying to discuss this subject
with a pediatrician. Most have staked their identities and
reputations on the presumed safety and effectiveness of
vaccines, and thus have difficulty acknowledging evidence to
the contrary.
The first pediatrician I attempted to share my findings with
yelled angrily at me when I calmly brought up the subject.
The misconceptions have very deep roots.
MYTH #1
"Vaccines
are completely safe..."
...or
are they ?
(Numbers in brackets refer to references at the bottom of
this article)
The FDA's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System)
receives about 11,000 reports of serious adverse reactions
to vaccination annually, some 1% (112+) of which are deaths
from vaccine reactions.[1]
The majority of these reports are made by doctors, and the
majority of deaths are attributed to the pertussis (whooping
cough) vaccine, the "P" in DPT. This figure alone is
alarming, yet it is only the "tip of the iceberg." The FDA
estimates that only about 10% of adverse reactions are
reported, [2] a figure supported by two National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) investigations. [3]
In fact, the NVIC reported that "In New York, only one out
of 40 doctor's offices [2.5%] confirmed that they report a
death or injury following vaccination," -- 97.5% of vaccine
related deaths and disabilities go unreported there.
Implications about the integrity of medical professionals
aside (doctors are legally required to report serious
adverse events), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths
actually occurring each year may be well over 1,000.
With pertussis, the number of vaccine-related deaths dwarfs
the number of disease deaths, which have been about 10
annually for recent years according to the CDC, and only 8
in 1993, the last peak-incidence year (pertussis runs in 3-4
year cycles, though vaccination certainly doesn't). Simply
put, the vaccine is 100 times more deadly than the disease.
Given the many instances in which highly vaccinated
populations have contracted disease (see Myth #2), and the
fact that the vast majority of disease decline this century
occurred before compulsory vaccinations (pertussis deaths
declined 79% prior to vaccines; see Myth #3), this
comparison is a valid one--and this enormous number of
vaccine casualities can hardly be considered a necessary
sacrifice for the benefit of a disease-free society.
Unfortunately, the vaccine-related-deaths story doesn't end
here. Both national and international studies have shown
vaccination to be a cause of SIDS[4,5] (SIDS is "Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome," a "catch-all" diagnosis given when
the specific cause of death is unknown; estimates range from
5 - 10,000 cases each year in the U.S.).
One study found the peak incidence of SIDS occurred at the
ages of 2 and 4 months in the U.S., precisely when the first
two routine immunizations are given,[4] while another found
a clear pattern of correlation extending three weeks after
immunization. Another study found that 3,000 children die
within 4 days of vaccination each year in the U.S.
(amazingly, the authors reported no SIDS/vaccine
relationship), while yet another researcher's studies led to
the conclusion that half of SIDS cases--that would be 2500
to 5000 infant deaths in the U.S. each year--are caused by
vaccines.[4]
There are studies that claimed to find no SIDS-vaccine
relationship. However, many of these were invalidated by yet
another study which found that "confounding" had skewed
their results in favor of the vaccine.[6] Shouldn't we err
on the side of caution? Shouldn't any credible correlation
between vaccines and infant deaths be just cause for
meticulous, widespread monitoring of the vaccination status
of all SIDS cases?
In the mid 70's Japan raised their vaccination age from 2
months to 2 years; their incidence of SIDS dropped
dramatically. In spite of this, the U.S. medical community
has chosen a posture of denial. Coroners refuse to check the
vaccination status of SIDS victims, and unsuspecting
families continue to pay the price, unaware of the dangers
and denied the right to make a choice.
Low adverse event reporting also suggests that the total
number of adverse reactions actually occurring each year may
be more than 100,000.
Due to doctors' failure to report, no one knows how many of
these are permanent disabilities, but statistics suggest
that it is several times the number of deaths (see
"petitions" below). This concern is reinforced by a study
which revealed that 1 in 175 children who completed the full
DPT series suffered "severe reactions," [7] and a Dr.'s
report for attorneys which found that 1 in 300 DPT
immunizations resulted in seizures.[8]
England actually saw a drop in pertussis deaths when
vaccination rates dropped from 80% to 30% in the mid 70's.
Swedish epidemiologist B. Trollfors' study of pertussis
vaccine efficacy and toxicity around the world found that
"pertussis-associated mortality is currently very low in
industrialised countries and no difference can be discerned
when countries with high, low, and zero immunisation rates
were compared." He also found that England, Wales, and West
Germany had more pertussis fatalities in 1970 when the
immunization rate was high than during the last half of
1980, when rates had fallen.[9]
Vaccinations cost us much more than just the lives and
health of our children. The U.S. Federal Government's
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) has
paid out over $724.4 million to parents of vaccine injured
and killed children, in taxpayer dollars. The NVICP has
received over 5000 petitions since 1988, including over 700
for vaccine-related deaths, and there are still over 2800
total death and injury cases pending that may take years to
resolve.[10]
Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies have a captive market:
vaccines are legally mandated in all 50 U.S. states (though
legally avoidable in most: (see Myth #9), yet yet these same
companies are "immune" from accountability for the
consequences of their products. Furthermore, they have been
allowed to use "gag orders" as a leverage tool in vaccine
damage legal settlements to prevent disclosure of
information to the public about vaccination dangers. Such
arrangements are clearly unethical; they force a
non-consenting American public to pay for vaccine
manufacturer's liabilities, while attempting to ensure that
this same public will remain ignorant of the dangers of
their products.
It is interesting to note that insurance companies (who do
the best liability studies) refuse to cover vaccine adverse
reactions. Profits appear to dictate both the pharmaceutical
and insurance companies' positions.
TRUTH #1
"Vaccination causes significant death and disability at an
astounding personal and financial cost to families and
taxpayers."
MYTH #2
"Vaccines are very effective..."
...or are they?
The medical literature has a surprising number of studies
documenting vaccine failure. Measles, mumps, small pox,
polio and Hib outbreaks have all occurred in vaccinated
populations. [11, 12, 13, 14 ,15] In 1989 the CDC reported:
"Among school-aged children, [measles] outbreaks have
occurred in schools with vaccination levels of greater than
98 percent.[16] [They] have occurred in all parts of the
country, including areas that had not reported measles for
years."[17] The CDC even reported a measles outbreak in a
documented 100 percent vaccinated population. [18]
A study examining this phenomenon concluded, "The apparent
paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high
levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of
immunized persons."[19] A more recent study found that
measles vaccination "produces immune suppression which
contributes to an increased susceptibility to other
infections."[19a]
These studies suggest that the goal of complete immunization
is actually counterproductive, a notion underscored by
instances in which epidemics followed complete immunization
of entire countries. Japan experienced yearly increases in
small pox following the introduction of compulsory vaccines
in 1872. By 1892, there were 29,979 deaths, and all had been
vaccinated. [20]
Early in this century, the Philippines experienced their
worst smallpox epidemic ever after 8 million people received
24.5 million vaccine doses; the death rate quadrupled as a
result. [21] In 1989, the country of Oman experienced a
widespread polio outbreak six months after achieving
complete vaccination.[22] In the U.S. in 1986, 90% of 1300
pertussis cases in Kansas were "adequately vaccinated." [23]
72% of pertussis cases in the 1993 Chicago outbreak were
fully up to date with their vaccinations.[24]
TRUTH #2
"Evidence suggests that vaccination is an unreliable means
of preventing disease."
MYTH #3
"Vaccines are the main reason for low disease rates in the
U.S. today..."
...or are they?
According to the British Association for the Advancement of
Science, childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and
1940, paralleling improved sanitation and hygienic
practices, well before mandatory vaccination programs.
Infectious disease deaths in the U.S. and England declined
steadily by an average of about 80% during this century
(measles mortality declined over 97%) prior to
vaccinations.[25]
In Great Britain, the polio epidemics peaked in 1950, and
had declined 82% by the time the vaccine was introduced
there in 1956. Thus, at best, vaccinations can be credited
with only a small percentage of the overall decline in
disease related deaths this century. Yet even this small
portion is questionable, as the rate of decline remained
virtually the same after vaccines were introduced.
Furthermore, European countries that refused immunization
for small pox and polio saw the epidemics end along with
those countries that mandated it. (In fact, both small pox
and polio immunization campaigns were followed initially by
significant disease incidence increases; during smallpox
vaccination campaigns, other infectious diseases continued
their declines in the absence of vaccines. In England and
Wales, smallpox disease and vaccination rates eventually
declined simultaneously over a period of several
decades.[26])
It is thus impossible to say whether or not vaccinations
contributed to the continuing decline in disease death
rates, or if the same forces which brought about the initial
declines--improved sanitation, hygiene, improvements in
diet, natural disease cycles--were simply unaffected by the
vaccination programs. Underscoring this conclusion was a
recent World Health Organization report which found that the
disease and mortality rates in third world countries have no
direct correlation with immunization procedures or medical
treatment, but are closely related to the standard of
hygiene and diet. [27] Credit given to vaccinations for our
current disease incidence has simply been grossly
exaggerated, if not outright misplaced.
Vaccine advocates point to incidence statistics rather than
mortality as proof of vaccine effectiveness. However,
statisticians tell us that mortality statistics can be a
better measure of incidence than the incidence figures
themselves, for the simple reason that the quality of
reporting and record-keeping is much higher on
fatalities.[28]
For instance, a recent survey in New York City revealed that
only 3.2% of pediatricians were actually reporting measles
cases to the health department. In 1974, the CDC determined
that there were 36 cases of measles in Georgia, while the
Georgia State Surveillance System reported 660 cases.[29]
In 1982, Maryland state health officials blamed a pertussis
epidemic on a television program, "D.P.T.--Vaccine
Roulette," which warned of the dangers of DPT; however, when
former top virologist for the U.S. Division of Biological
Standards, Dr. J. Anthony Morris, analyzed the 41 cases,
only 5 were confirmed, and all had been vaccinated. [30]
Such instances as these demonstrate the fallacy of incidence
figures, yet vaccine advocates tend to rely on them
indiscriminately.
TRUTH #3
"It is unclear what impact vaccines had on the infectious
disease declines that occurred throughout this century."
MYTH #4
"Vaccination is based on sound immunization theory and
practice..."
...or is it?
The clinical evidence for vaccinations is their ability to
stimulate antibody production in the recipient, a fact which
is not disputed. What is not clear, however, is whether or
not such antibody production constitutes immunity. For
example, agamma globulin-anemic children are incapable of
producing antibodies, yet they recover from infectious
diseases almost as quickly as other children.[31]
Furthermore, a study published by the British Medical
Council in 1950 during a diphtheria epidemic concluded that
there was no relationship between antibody count and disease
incidence; researchers found resistant people with extremely
low antibody counts and sick people with high counts. [32]
Natural immunization is a complex phenomenon involving many
organs and systems; it cannot be fully replicated by the
artificial stimulation of antibody production.
Research also indicates that vaccination commits immune
cells to the specific antigens involved in the vaccine,
rendering them incapable of reacting to other infections.
Our immunological reserve may thus actually be reduced,
causing a generally lowered resistance. [33]
Another component of immunization theory is "herd immunity,"
which states that when enough people in a community are
immunized, all are protected. As Myth #2 revealed, there are
many documented instances showing just the opposite--fully
vaccinated populations do contract diseases; with measles,
this actually seems to be the direct result of high
vaccination rates.[19] A Minnesota state epidemiologist
concluded that the Hib vaccine increases the risk of illness
when a study revealed that vaccinated children were five
times more likely to contract meningitis than unvaccinated
children.
Carefully selected epidemiological studies are yet another
justification for vaccination programs. However, many of
these may not be legitimate sources from which to draw
conclusions about vaccine effectiveness. For example, if 100
people are vaccinated and 5 contract the disease, the
vaccine is declared to be 95% effective. But if only 10 of
the 100 were actually exposed to the disease, then the
vaccine was really only 50% effective. Since no one is
willing to directly expose an entire population to
disease--even a fully vaccinated one--vaccine effectiveness
rates may not indicate a vaccine's true effectiveness.
Yet another surprising concern about immunization practice
is its assumption that all children, regardless of age, are
virtually the same. An 8 pound 2 month old receives the same
dosage as a 40 pound five year old. Infants with immature,
undeveloped immune systems may receive five or more times
the dosage (relative to body weight) as older children.
Furthermore, the number of "units" within doses has been
found upon random testing to range from 1/2 to 3 times what
the label indicates; manufacturing quality controls appear
to tolerate a rather large margin of error. "Hot
Lots"--vaccine lots with disproportionately high death and
disability rates--have been identified repeatedly by the
NVIC, but the FDA refuses to intervene to prevent further
unnecessary injury and deaths. In fact, they have never
recalled a vaccine lot due to adverse reactions. Some would
call this infanticide.
Finally, vaccination practice assumes that all recipients,
regardless of race, culture, diet, geographic location, or
any other circumstances, will respond the same. This was
perhaps never more dramatically disproved than an instance a
few years ago in Australia's Northern Territory, where
stepped-up immunization campaigns resulted in an incredible
*50%* infant mortality rate in the native aborigines.[34]
Researcher A. Kalokerinos, M.D. discovered that the
aborigine's vitamin C deficient "junk food" diet (imposed on
them by white society) was a critical factor (studies had
already shown that vaccination depletes vitamin C reserves;
children in shock or collapse often recovered in a matter of
minutes when given vitamin C injections). He considered it
amazing that as many survived as did. One must wonder about
the lives of the survivors, though, for if half died, surely
the other half did not escape unaffected.
Almost as troubling was a very recent study in the New
England Journal of Medicine which revealed that a
substantial number of Romanian children were contracting
polio from the vaccine, a less common phenomena in most
developed countries. Correlations with injections of
antibiotics were found: a single injection within one month
of vaccination raised the risk of polio 8 times, 2 to 9
injections raised the risk 27-fold, and 10 or more
injections raised the risk 182 times [Washington Post,
February 22, 1995].
What other factors not accounted for in vaccination theory
will surface unexpectedly to reveal unforeseen or previously
overlooked consequences? We will not begin to fully
comprehend the scope of this danger until researchers begin
looking and reporting in earnest. In the meantime, entire
countries' populations are unwitting gamblers in a game that
many might very well choose not to play if they were given
all the "rules" in advance.
TRUTH #4
"Many of the assumptions upon which immunization theory and
practice are based have been proven false in their
application."
MYTH #5
"Childhood diseases are extremely dangerous..."
...or are they, really?
Most childhood infectious diseases have few serious
consequences in today's modern world. Even conservative CDC
statistics for pertussis during 1992-94 indicate a 99.8%
recovery rate. In fact, when hundreds of pertussis cases
occurred in Ohio and Chicago in the fall 1993 outbreak, an
infectious disease expert from Cincinnati Children's
Hospital said, "The disease was very mild, no one died, and
no one went to the intensive care unit."
The vast majority of the time, childhood infectious diseases
are benign and self-limiting. They may also impart lifelong
immunity, whereas vaccine-induced immunity is only
temporary. In fact, the temporary nature of vaccine immunity
can create a more dangerous situation in a child's future.
For example, the new chicken pox vaccine has an
effectiveness estimated at 6 - 10 years. If effective, it
will postpone the child's vulnerability until adulthood,
when death from the disease is 20 times more likely.
About half of measles cases in the late 1980's resurgence
were in adolescents and adults, most of whom were vaccinated
as children,[35] and the recommended booster shots may
provide protection for less than 6 months.[36] Furthermore,
some healthcare professionals are concerned that the virus
from the chicken pox vaccine may "reactivate later in life
in the form of herpes zoster (shingles) or other immune
system disorders."[37]
Dr. A. Lavin of the Dept. of Pediatrics, St. Luke's Medical
Center in Cleveland, Ohio, strongly opposed licensing the
new vaccine, "Until we actually know...the risks involved in
injecting mutated DNA [herpes virus] into the host genome
[children]."[38] The truth is, *no one* knows, but the
vaccine is now licensed and recommended by health
authorities.
Not only are most infectious diseases rarely dangerous, but
they can actually play a vital role in the development of a
strong, healthy immune system. Persons who have not had
measles have a higher incidence of certain skin diseases,
degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain
tumors, while absence of mumps has been linked to higher
risks of ovarian cancer.
TRUTH #5
"Dangers of childhood diseases are greatly exaggerated in
order to scare parents into compliance with a questionable
but profitable procedure."
MYTH #6
"Polio was one of the clearly great vaccination success
stories..."
...or was it?
Six New England states reported increases in polio one year
after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more
than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts' astounding
increase of 642%. In 1959, 77.5% of Massachusetts' paralytic
cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine).
During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard
Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the
University of North Carolina School of Public Health,
testified that not only did the cases of polio increase
substantially after mandatory vaccinations (50% increase
from 1957 to 1958, 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but that
the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service
to give the opposite impression.[39]
According to researcher-author Dr. Viera Scheibner, 90% of
polio cases were eliminated from statistics by health
authorities' redefinition of the disease when the vaccine
was introduced, while in reality the Salk vaccine was
continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at
a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild
virus.
For example, in the U.S., thousands of cases of viral and
aseptic meningitis are reported each year--these were
routinely diagnosed as polio before the Saulk vaccine; the
number of cases needed to declare an epidemic was raised
from 20 to 35; and the requirement for inclusion in
paralysis statistics was changed from symptoms for 24 hours
to symptoms for 60 days; it is no wonder that polio
decreased radically after vaccines--at least on paper.
In 1985, the CDC reported that 87% of the cases of polio in
the U.S. between 1973 and 1983 were caused by the vaccine,
and later declared that all but a few imported cases since
were caused by the vaccine--and most of the imported cases
occurred in fully immunized individuals.
Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate
subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were
caused by the oral polio vaccine. At a workshop on polio
vaccines sponsored by the Institute of Medicine and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Samuel Katz
of Duke University cited the estimated 8-10 annual U.S.
cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) in people
who have taken the oral polio vaccine, and the [four year]
absence of wild polio from the western hemisphere.
Jessica Scheer of the National Rehabilitation Hospital
Research Center in Washington, D.C., pointed out that most
parents are unaware that polio vaccination in this country
entails "a small number of human sacrifices each year."
Compounding this contradiction are low adverse event
reporting and the NVIC's experiences with confirming and
correcting misdiagnoses of vaccine reactions, which suggest
that the actual number of VAPP "sacrifices" may be many
times higher than the number cited by the CDC.
TRUTH #6
"Vaccines caused substantial increases in polio after years
of steady declines, and they are the sole cause of polio in
the U.S. today."
MYTH #7
"My child had no short-term reaction to vaccination, so
there is nothing to worry about..."
...or is there?
The documented long term adverse effects of vaccines include
chronic immunological and neurological disorders such as
autism, hyperactivity, attention deficit disorder, dyslexia,
allergies, cancer, and other conditions, many of which
barely existed 30 years ago before mass vaccination
programs. Vaccine components include known carcinogens such
as thimersol, aluminum phosphate, and formaldehyde (the
Poisons Information Centre in Australia claims there is no
acceptable safe amount of formaldehyde which can be injected
into a living human body).
Medical historian, researcher and author Harris Coulter,
Ph.D. explained that his extensive research revealed
childhood immunization to be "...causing a low-grade
encephalitis in infants on a much wider scale than public
health authorities were willing to admit, about 15-20% of
all children." He points out that the sequelae [conditions
known to result from a disease] of encephalitis
[inflammation of the brain, a known side-effect of
vaccination]: autism, learning disabilities, minimal and
not-so-minimal brain damage, seizures, epilepsy, sleeping
and eating disorders, sexual disorders, asthma, crib death,
diabetes, obesity, and impulsive violence are precisely the
disorders which afflict contemporary society.
Many of these conditions were formerly relatively rare, but
they have become more common as childhood vaccination
programs have expanded. Coulter also points out that
"...pertussis toxoid is used to create encephalitis in lab
animals."
A German study found correlations between vaccinations and
22 neurological conditions including attention deficit and
epilepsy. The dilemma is that viral elements in vaccines may
persist and mutate in the human body for years, with unknown
consequences. Millions of children are partaking in an
enormous, crude experiment; and no sincere, organized effort
is being made by the medical community to track the negative
side-effects or to determine the long term consequences.
TRUTH #7
"The long term adverse effects of vaccinations have been
virtually ignored, in spite of direct correlations with many
chronic conditions."
MYTH #8
"Vaccines are the only disease prevention option
available..."
...or are they?
Most parents feel compelled to take some disease-preventing
action for their children. While there is no 100% guarantee
anywhere, there are viable alternatives. Historically,
homeopathy has been more effective than "mainstream"
allopathic medicine in treating and preventing disease. In a
U.S. cholera outbreak in 1849, allopathic medicine saw a
48-60% death rate, while homeopathic hospitals had a
documented death rate of only 3%.[40] Roughly similar
statistics still hold true for cholera today.[41] Recent
epidemiological studies show homeopathic remedies as
equaling or surpassing standard vaccinations in preventing
disease. There are reports in which populations that were
treated homeopathically after exposure had a 100% success
rate--none of the treated caught the disease.[42]
There are homeopathic kits available for disease prevention.
[43] Homeopathic remedies can also be taken only during
times of increased risk (outbreaks, traveling, etc.), and
have proven highly effective in such instances. And since
these remedies have no toxic components, they have no side
effects. In addition, homeopathy has been effective in
reversing some of the disability caused by vaccine
reactions, as well as many other chronic conditions with
which allopathic medicine has had little success.
TRUTH #8
"Documented safe and effective alternatives to vaccination
have been available for decades but suppressed by the
medical establishment."
MYTH #9
"Vaccinations are legally mandated, and thus unavoidable..."
...or are they?
There are three exemption possibilities in the U.S.:
1) Medical Exemption: All 50 states in the U.S. allow for a
medical exemption. A few states allow licensed naturopathic
or chiropractic doctors to issue medical exemptions in
addition to medical doctors. However, few pediatricians
check for indications of increased risk before administering
vaccines, so it is advisable for parents to research this
matter for themselves. Epilepsy, severe allergies, and
siblings' previous adverse reactions are but a few of the
many conditions in child or family history which may
increase the chances of an adverse reaction, and thus
qualify for a medical exemption;
2) Religious Exemption: Nearly all states allow for a
religious exemption. This may or may not require membership
in an established religious organization, as individual
state laws vary; and
3) Philosophical or Personal Exemption: An increasing number
of states allow one of these exemptions, in recognition of
the controversy and/or violation of freedom that mandated
vaccination laws impose.
Generally, exempted children may not be banned from
attending public schools and colleges except during local
outbreaks. It is best to contact local school officials in
advance to determine their particular procedure for handling
exemptions.
The best source for a copy of your state's vaccination laws
is state health officials or our public library. A phone
call to the state Department of Epidemiology may be all that
it takes to get a copy mailed to you.
TRUTH #9
"Legal exemptions from vaccinations are obtainable for most
- but not all - US citizens."
MYTH #10
"Public health officials always place health above all other
concerns..."
...or do they?
Vaccination history is riddled with documented instances of
deceit designed to portray vaccines as mighty disease
conquerors, when in fact many times they have actually
delayed and even reversed disease declines. The United
Kingdom's Department of Health admitted that vaccination
status determined the diagnosis of subsequent diseases:
Those found in vaccinated patients received alternate
diagnoses; hospital records and death certificates were
falsified. Today, many doctors are still reluctant to
diagnose diseases in vaccinated children, and so the "Myth"
about vaccine success continues.
However, individual doctors may not be wholly to blame. As
medical students, few have reason to question the
information taught (which does not address the information
presented in this report). Ironically, medicine is a field
which demands conformity; there is little tolerance for
opinions opposing the status quo.
Doctors cannot warn you about what they themselves do not
know, and with little time for further education once they
begin practice, they are, in a sense, held captive by a
system which discourages them from acquiring information
independently and forming their own opinions. Those few that
dare to question the status quo are frequently ostracized,
and in any case, they are still legally bound to adhere to
the system's legal mandates.
SUMMARY
In the December 1994 Medical Post, Canadian author of the
best-seller Medical Mafia, Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. stated,
"The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a
disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of
illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through
vaccination...10 years from now we will know that the
biggest crime against humanity was vaccines."
After an extensive study of the medical literature on
vaccination, Dr. Viera Scheibner concluded that "there is no
evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent
any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of
evidence that they cause serious side effects."
John B. Classen, M.D., M.B.A. has stated, "My data proves
that the studies used to support immunization are so flawed
that it is impossible to say if immunization provides a net
benefit to anyone or to society in general. This question
can only be determined by proper studies which have never
been performed. The flaw of previous studies is that there
was no long term follow up and chronic toxicity was not
looked at. The American Society of Microbiology has
promotedmy research...and thus acknowledges the need for
proper studies."
To some these may seem like radical positions, but they are
not unfounded. The continued denial of the evidence against
vaccines only perpetuates the "Myths" and their negative
consequences on our children and society. Aggressive and
comprehensive scientific investigation is clearly warranted,
yet immunization programs continue to expand in the absence
of such research. Manufacturer profits are guaranteed, while
accountability for the negative effects is conspicuously
absent. This is especially sad given the readily available
safe and effective alternatives.
Meanwhile, the race is on. According to the NVIC, there are
over 250 new vaccines being developed for everything from
earaches to birth control to diarrhea, with about 100 of
these already in clinical trials. Researchers are working on
vaccine delivery through nasal sprays, mosquitoes (yes,
mosquitoes), and the fruits of "transgenic" plants in which
vaccine viruses are grown.
With every child (and adult, for that matter) on the planet
a potential required recipient of multiple doses, and every
healthcare system and government a potential buyer, it is
little wonder that countless millions of dollars are spent
nurturing the growing multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
Without public outcry, we will see more and more new
vaccines required of us and our children. And while profits
are readily calculable, the real human costs are being
ignored.
Whatever your personal vaccination decision, make it an
informed one; you have that right and responsibility. It is
a difficult issue, but there is more than enough at stake to
justify whatever time and energy it takes.
Do not use this report alone to make your vaccination
decision:
Find out for yourself !
About the Author
Alan Phillips is an independent investigator and writer on
vaccine risks and alternatives. This report appeared in the
April 1996 edition of "Wildfire Magazine," as well as
numerous newsletters in the U.S. and around the world. It is
being used by the Sheffield School of Homeopathy, UK. Alan
has written to the Australian Minister for Human Services
and Health for the Immunisation Investigation Group and the
Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical Research in NSW
Australia.
Alan is also the founder of Human Development Services,
Inc., an international nonprofit conducting training and
research in psychorientology; the designer of a national
children's literacy program and materials; and a
singer-songwriter and composer with albums of original songs
and music in over two dozen countries on six continents. His
academic achievements include a B.A. Magna Cum Laude, and
election to the Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society and The
National Dean's List.
For Further Information visit his website at
http://www.unc.edu/~aphillip/www/vaccine/informed.htm
Copyright © 2003, Alan Phillips
HOROWITZ ON VACCINES
by Dr Len Horowitz
AUDIO TAPE
ESSENTIAL LISTENING!
This tape will grip your attention! Dr Horowitz, a Harvard
graduate with a degree in public health, is probably the
world authority on the dangers of vaccinations. He is also
an excellent speaker. This tape gives you much of the
information you need to know about the safety and efficacy
of vaccines.
Order this from
www.healthyworlddistributing.com
VACCINATION: 100 Years of Orthodox Research shows that
Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System
Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.
The best book on vaccination! Brilliant book! This is the
most well-documented indictment of vaccinations anywhere in
the world.
Extensively cited with orthodox medical research studies.
Required reading for anyone seriously investigating this
issue.
MORE INFORMATION:
Homeopathic Medicine for counter-acting the effects of
Vaccination:
While not as good as NOT getting vaccinated, I have been
told by a number of healers that the homeopathic medicine
Thuja was very helpful. Here's a link that has some:
Vaccination Detox
http://www.greatestherbsonearth.com/nsp/vaccination_detox.htm
Vaccination Liberation
http://www.vaclib.org/
Emerging Scandal in Vaccine Mandates
http://eagleforum.org/column/1999/july99/99-07-28.html
Shaken Babies or Vaccine Damage?
www.nexusmagazine.com/shakenbaby.html
Dr Len Horowitz' website
www.tetrahedron.org
Why I Never get Flu Shots
http://www.mercola.com/2000/nov/26/flu_shots.htm
Postal Workers Warned against Pentagon Anthrax Vaccine
www.rense.com/general18/anth.htm
Vaccine Damage
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/damage.html
Bush Asks Court to Seal Documents linking Autism to Vaccines
www.rense.com/general32/mmr.htm
Smallpox Vaccination Risks
http://www.relfe.com/smallpox_vaccine_problems.html
References
National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA
22161, 703-487-4650, 703-487-4600.
Reported by KM Severyn,R.Ph.,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily News,
May 28, 1993. (Ohio Parents for Vaccine Safety, 251 Ridgeway
Dr., Dayton, OH 45459)
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave.
W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative
Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."
Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox
Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on
the Immune System.
W.C. Torch, "Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization:
A potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS)," (Amer. Adacemy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting,
Apr 25 - May 1, 1982), Neurology 32(4), pt. 2.
Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines [see
comments]. Fine PE, Chen RT, REVIEW ARTICLE: 38 REFS.
Comment in: Am J Epidemiol 1994 Jan 15;139(2):229-30.
Division of Immunization, Centers for Disease Control,
Atlanta, GA 30333.
Nature and Rates of Adverse Reactions Associated with DTP
and DT Immunizations in Infants and Children" (Pediatrics,
Nov. 1981, Vol. 68, No. 5)
The Fresno Bee, Community Relations, 1626 E. Street, Fresno,
CA 93786, DPT Report, December 5, 1984.
Trollfors B, Rabo, E. 1981.
Whooping cough in adults. British Medical Journal (September
12), 696-97.
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Health
Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building,
Room 7-90, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
800-338-2382.
Measles vaccine failures: lack of sustained measles specific
immunoglobulin G responses in revaccinated adolescents and
young adults. Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown
University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007. Pediatric
Infectious Disease Journal. 13(1):34-8, 1994 Jan.
Measles outbreak in 31 schools: risk factors for vaccine
failure and evaluation of a selective revaccination
strategy. Department of Preventive Medicine and
Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Ont. Canadian Medical
Association Journal. 150(7):1093-8, 1994 Apr 1.
Haemophilus b disease after vaccination with Haemophilus b
polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine. Institution Division of
Bacterial Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Md 20892.
American Journal of Diseases of Children. 145(12):1379-82,
1991 Dec.
Sustained transmission of mumps in a highly vaccinated
population: assessment of primary vaccine failure and waning
vaccine-induced immunity. Division of Field Epidemiology,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 169(1):77-82, 1994
Jan. 1.
Secondary measles vaccine failure in healthcare workers
exposed to infected patients. Department of Pediatrics,
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104. Infection
Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 14(2):81-6, 1993 Feb.
MMWR, 38 (8-9), 12/29/89).
MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) "Measles."
1989; 38:329-330.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).
33(24),6/22/84.
Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent
paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Review
article: 50 REFS. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Mayo Vaccine
Research Group, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN.
Archives of Internal Medicine. 154(16):1815-20, 1994 Aug 22.
(19a) Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, May 1996;
79(2): 163-170.
(20) Trevor Gunn, Mass Immunization, A Point in Question, p
15 (E.D. Hume, Pasteur Exposed-The False Foundations of
Modern Medicine, Bookreal, Australia, 1989.)
(21) Physician William Howard Hay's address of June 25,
1937; printed in the Congressional Record.
(22) Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman; evidence
for widespread transmission among fully vaccinated children
Lancet vol 338: Sept 21, 1991; 715-720.
(23) Neil Miller, Vaccines: Are They Safe and Effective? p
33.
(24) Chicago Dept. of Health.
(25) See Note 23 pp 18-40.
(26) See Note 23 pp 45,46 [NVIC News, April 92, p12].
(27) S. Curtis, A Handbook of Homeopathic Alternatives to
Immunization.
(28) Darrell Huff, How to Lie With Statistics, p 84.
(29) quoted from the internet, credited to Keith Block,
M.D., a family physician from Evanston, Illinois, who has
spent years collecting data in the medical literature on
immunizations.
(30) See Note 20, p 15.
(31) See Note 20 p 21.
(32) See Note 20, p 21 (British Medical Council Publication
272, May 1950)
(33) See Note 20, p 21; also Note 23 p 47 (Buttram, MD,
Hoffman, Mothering Magazine, Winter 1985 p 30; Kalokerinos
and Dettman, MDs, "The Dangers of Immunization," Biological
Research Inst. [Australia], 1979, p 49).
(34) Archie Kalolerinos, MD, Every Second Child, Keats
Publishing, Inc. 1981
(35) Reported by KM Severyn,R.Ph,Ph.D. in the Dayton Daily
News, June 3, 1995.
(36) Vaccine Information and Awareness, "Measles and
Antibody Titre Levels," from Vaccine Weekly, January 1996.
(37) NVIC Press Release, "Consumer Group Warns use of New
Chicken Pox Vaccine in all Healthy Children May Cause More
Serious Disease".
(38) See note 35 (quoted from The Lancet)
(39) Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign
Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second
Session on H.R. 10541, May 1962, p.94.
(40) Ullman, Discovering Homeopathy, p 42 (Thomas L.
Bradford, Logic Figures, p68, 113-146; Coulter, Divided
Legacy, Vol 3, p268).
(41) See Note 27.
(42) See Note 27.
(43) Golden, Isaac, Vaccination? A Review of Risks and
Alternatives.
http://www.relfe.com
-
Email:
Stephanie@relfe.com
Ingri Cassel, President Vaccination Liberation - Idaho
Chapter - P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, ID 83869 (208)255-2307/ 888-249-1421 -
vaclib@coldreams.com
-
www.vaclib.org
U.S. Representative Ron Paul
- This article was provided
courtesy of Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
and Tetrahedron Publishing Group
- 206 North 4th Avenue,
Suite 147
- Sandpoint, Idaho 83864
http://www.tetrahedron.org
- Toll free order line: 888-508-4787;
- Office telephone: 208-265-2575;
FAX: 208-265-2775
E-mail:
tetra@tetrahedron.org
See also:
http://www.scifiles.us
http://www.c-cure.com
http://www.tetraassoc.com
http://www.insighthour.net
http://www.SARSscam.com
http://www.originofaids.com
http://www.cureforSARS.net
http://www.deathintheair.com
http://www.SteamVentSpa.com
http://www.DrLenHorowitz.com
http://www.allaboutsmallpox.com
http://www.GulfWarIllnesses.com
http://www.westnilevirusscam.com
http://www.healthadvisorsonline.net
http://www.healingcelebrations.com
http://www.1st-in-meal-replacement.com
http://www.americanreddoublecross.com
http://www.healthyworlddistributing.com
http://www.prophecyandpreparedness.com
Visit also
our friends at:
www.vaclib.org
Tratto da:
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/contradictions.htm
|
"Questo sito
WEB vi informa"
Non siamo
responsabili della correttezza e/o della solvibilità
degli inserzionisti del ns. Network
Webmaster
- Copyright © 1998, Publisher Bamico ltd - All rights reserved
Tutti i diritti riservati - Vietata
la copia anche parziale dei contenuti, se non viene citata la fonte |
|
|
